Welcome to SciCommons
Be part of the change. Join our open platform to review, rate, and access research freely. Improve research quality and accessibility with community-driven peer review.
Contact us at:
Our Supporters
Features
Uniqueness of our platform
Pseudonymity
An innovative open peer review website promoting Pseudonymity for unbiased feedback and evaluation.
Multiple Community Review
An article can be reviewed by multiple communities, each community can have multiple reviewers.
Article Versioning
You can submit multiple versions of an article, each version can be reviewed by multiple communities.
Double Blind Review
The reviewer and the author are unaware of each other's identity. This is to ensure unbiased review.
Random Reviewer Assignment
The reviewer is randomly assigned to an article to ensure unbiased review.
Random Handle Name
Every user is assigned a random handle name for each corresponding article to hide the identity of reviewers.
We Have Answered Almost All Your Questions
How are reviewers picked by the system?
Reviewers are chosen randomly to guarantee impartial assessments. By employing this method, the system aims to prevent any potential biases that could influence the review process. This random selection ensures that each submission receives a fair evaluation, upholding the integrity and credibility of the reviewing mechanism. It's a critical step in maintaining objectivity and trust in the review process.
Are users assigned a random handle name for each article?
Indeed, users are provided with a random handle name for each article to ensure anonymity. This system promotes unbiased interactions and feedback, as the identity of the contributor remains concealed, allowing the content to be the primary focus.
Are users rated based on the reaction scores they receive for a review?
Indeed, users are evaluated based on the reaction scores they garner for their reviews. This scoring system is instrumental in upholding the quality of reviews on our platform. By providing a metric for feedback, we can encourage constructive criticism and ensure that reviewers are motivated to offer insightful and valuable feedback. Such measures are vital to foster a credible and trustworthy review environment.
Can I submit more than one review for an article?
No, each user is allowed only one review for an article to ensure diverse feedback. However, if you wish to modify or update your thoughts, you have the flexibility to edit your existing review. This ensures that you can refine your feedback while still adhering to the platform's guidelines.
Is the review process still open after the article has been published?
Yes, the review process continues even after the article has been published. By keeping it open, we encourage ongoing dialogue and ensure that authors receive continuous feedback. This approach facilitates iterative improvement and adapts to the evolving perspectives of readers and experts.